Measured Results
MEAS 1
Rethinking Cost-Benefit Tests
It is appropriate to use
program cost-effectiveness measures to allocate scarce resources among competing programs. However, if cost-effectiveness measures focus on the current value
of energy savings, rather than considering longer run energy costs, environmental impacts, and non energy benefits, they can lead to poor policy decisions.
This session will examine current benefit/cost forecasting and evaluation practices and will suggest possible improvements that consider a more complete
array of benefits to offset both program and participant costs.
By attending this session, participants
will
1. Understand why
cost-effectiveness tests need to consider more than current energy savings
2.
Examine models for measuring cost-effectiveness in the context of home performance
programs
3. Do a better job
in measuring the benefits associated with all types of programs
Keywords: cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, performance measurement, home
performance, non energy benefits, evaluation.
Jennifer Thorne Amann, ACEEE,
David Carroll, APPRISE,
Robert Knight, Bevilacqua-Knight, Inc.,